Table of Contents
- Welcome video from the author
- Introduction
- Epidemiology
- Etiology
- Pathophysiology
- Clinical features
- Typical CIDP
- CIPD variants
- Distal CIDP
- Multifocal CIDP
- Motor CIDP
- Focal CIDP
- Sensory CIDP
- Diagnostic Evaluation
- Electrodiagnostic testing
- Laboratory studies
- Lumbar puncture
- Neuroimaging
- Nerve ultrasound
- Nerve biopsy
- Diagnosis
- Diagnostic Approach according to the EFNS/PNS
- Step 1: Clinical Determination of CIDP
- Step 2: Electrodiagnostic assessment
- Step 3: Differentiate between typical and atypical CIDP
- Supportive criteria
- Differential diagnosis
- Management
- Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG)
- Plasma exchange
- Glucocorticoids
- Immunosuppressive agents
- Responses to therapy assessment
- Frequency of follow-ups
- Objective tools
- Table 1: CIDP objective assessment tools
- Prognosis
- Further Reading
- Bibliography
Primary Category
Neuroimmunology
P-Category
Secondary Category
S-Category
Authors:
Welcome video from the author
Introduction
- Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare immune-mediated disorder affecting the peripheral nervous system
- Typical manifestations include proximal and distal sensory and motor impairment in four limbs, developing over more than 08 weeks
- Treatment consists of three therapies: glucocorticoids, intravenous immune globulin (IVIG), and plasma exchange
- Approximately 30% of patients with CIDP will achieve cure or remission
Diagnosis of CIDP
There is NO gold standard to diagnose CIDP. We recommend using the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve
Society (EFNS/PNS) diagnostic criteria due to their superior accuracy compared to other criteria.
Epidemiology
- Prevalence: 0.7 to 10.3 cases per 100,000 people [6]
Etiology
- The causes of CIDP and its variants remain unknown
- Unlike acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP), there is no specific predisposing risk factors for CIDP have been evidently recognized [7]
Pathophysiology
- CIDP is immune-mediated involving in both the cellular and humoral immunity system
- Cellular immunity: evidence of T cell activation, expression of cytokines, tumor necrosis factor, interferons, and interleukins [827,32]
- Humoral immunity: immunoglobulin (Ig) and complement deposition was found on myelinated nerve fibers. In an experiment on rats, injecting purified IgG from CIDP patients induced conduction block and demyelination [42]
- The specific immunologic triggers of CIDP in the majority of patients remain unclear
Clinical features
Typical CIDP
- SYMMETRIC nerve damage pattern
- Motor involvement > sensory involvement
- Motor symptoms:
- A similar degree of weakness in both proximal and distal muscles (non-length-dependent pattern)
- Proximal muscle weakness:
- Difficulty walking, climbing or descending stairs, rising from a seated position, and lifting objects overhead
- Distal muscle weakness:
- Tripping over the feet due to "foot drop," difficulty with fine motor tasks (e.g., buttoning, tying shoelaces), and difficulty opening doors or jars
- Cranial nerve and bulbar involvement was reported in 10 to 20 percent of patients
- Sensory symptoms:
- Global diminished or absent reflexes
- CIDP attacks nerves’ myelin → nerve fibers with the most myelin (motor and proprioceptive fibers) are MORE vulnerable than those with little or no myelin (autonomic and pain fibers)
- Proprioception impairment → gait ataxia
- Worse distally, starting with fingers and toes
- Autonomic involvement is uncommon [14]
- Typical CIDP could present in an acute fashion (acute-onset CIDP [A-CIDP]) in up to 13% of patients who may initially be misdiagnosed with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) [29,30]
There are NO specific clinical signs or laboratory tests that can differentiate between GBS and A-CIDP
CIPD variants
- Typical CIDP and CIDP variants are distinguished by their clinical presentation and/or pathogenic mechanism, but are not always clearly defined [10]
Distal CIDP
- Also known as Distal Acquired Demyelinating Symmetric neuropathy (DADS) [19]
- Symmetric sensory or sensorimotor defected in the lower extremities except for proximal limbs, trunk, and face [10]. Upper extremities involvement may present in the later stage
- Patients with signs and symptoms of DADS are likely to have a monoclonal gammopathy. Further hematologic workup may reveal either monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance (MGCS) or Waldenström macroglobulinemia [13]
DADS with monoclonal IgM is not considered CIDP and is unresponsive to the standard treatment
Multifocal CIDP
- Also known as Lewis-Sumner syndrome, or Multifocal Acquired Demyelinating Sensory and Motor Neuropathy (MADSAM)
- Remarkable asymmetric and multifocal neurological defects; maybe indistinct to mononeuropathy multiplex [21,28]
- Autonomic symptoms, neuropathic pain, and cranial nerve involvement have been previously reported [10]
Motor CIDP
- Symmetric proximal and distal weakness with normal sensation on both clinical and electrodiagnostic evaluation; may involve motor cranial nerves [10]
- Difficult to be distinguished between lower motor neuron-predominant amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and multifocal motor neuropathy
Focal CIDP
- Rare variant
Sensory CIDP
- Characterized by large-fiber sensory dysfunction, including gait ataxia, vibration and position sense impairment, and dysesthesias
- If combined with slow motor nerve conduction or motor conduction blocks → sensory-predominant CIDP
- ~70% of patients showed weakness in the later clinical stage [10]
Diagnostic Evaluation
Electrodiagnostic testing
- Should be conducted in ALL patients with suspected CIDP
- Extensive electrodiagnostic studies of the upper extremities or all four extremities are recommended
- A critical component in the EFNS/PNS diagnostic criteria (discussed below)
Laboratory studies
- There are NO specific laboratory findings pointing to CIDP
- The goal is to search for conditions either associated with or imitate CIDP, including diabetes mellitus, IgG or IgA monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), IgM monoclonal gammopathy without antibodies to MAG (anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein), HIV infection, or malignancies [37]
- The common work-up panel is as followed:
- Complete blood count (CBC)
- Fasting serum glucose
- Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C)
- Liver function
- Renal function
- Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and immunofixation
- Serum free light chain (FLC) assay, or 24-hour urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP) and immunofixation
- In particular scenarios or in patients with atypical presentations, additional tests should be considered to rule inflammatory or infective causes as comported to autoimmune:
- Borrelia burgdorferi serology
- C-reactive protein
- Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs)
- Angiotensin-converting enzyme
- Hepatitis panel (for types B and C)
- HIV antibody
- Chest radiograph
- Nodal-paranodal protein antibodies
- Skeletal survey
- Genetic screening for Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease or transthyretin (TTR) familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP)
Lumbar puncture
- Not indicated if the diagnosis of CIDP is clear
- To exclude other causes or serve as supportive criteria in the EFNS/PNS diagnostic criteria
- ~80% of patients with CIDP showed elevated protein (>45 mg/dL) and normal white cell count in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [2,1617] An elevated CSF white cell count of >10 cells/mm3 suggests a different diagnosis (infection, inflammation, or malignancies)
Neuroimaging
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium of the spine (including spinal roots, cauda equina), brachial plexus, lumbosacral plexus, and other nerve regions can reveal enlarged or abnormal nerves
- Indicated in patients with an unusual presentation, especially when clinical and electrophysiologic findings are focal, and to rule out other neuropathy and infiltrative pathology [11] (e.g., chronic immune sensory polyradiculopathy [CISP], chronic immune sensorimotor polyradiculopathy [CISMP])
- MRI abnormalities are one of the supportive criteria for CIDP in the EFNS/PNS diagnostic criteria
Nerve ultrasound
- May indicate when experts are available
- Can detect nerve hypertrophy; although the findings are not specific to CIDP, it may narrow down the lesion location
- Served as supportive criteria for CIDP in the EFNS/PNS diagnostic criteria
Nerve biopsy
- Consider indicating when:
- CIDP is multifocal in nature, plus motor fibers tend to be more affected than sensory nerves (the usual target of biopsy procedure) → difficult to catch demyelination evidence on the biopsy specimens
- Characteristics supporting the diagnosis of CIDP on nerve biopsy include
Diagnosis
- There is NO gold standard to diagnose CIDP
- We recommend using the EFNS/PNS diagnostic criteria due to their superior accuracy compared to other criteria [518]
- To serve our scope for this chapter, we mainly focus on typical CIDP, which occupies the majority of CIDP cases
Diagnostic Approach according to the EFNS/PNS
Step 1: Clinical Determination of CIDP
On history and physical examination, determine whether the patient potentially has CIDP using the clinical criteria for typical CIDP
Clinical criteria for typical CIDP
Must meet all the following
- Progressive or relapsing, symmetric, proximal, and distal muscle weakness of upper and lower limbs, and sensory involvement of at least two limbs
- Developing over at least 8 weeks
- Absent or reduced tendon reflexes in all limbs
Step 2: Electrodiagnostic assessment
If CIDP is suspected → conduct electrodiagnostic studies to assess motor and sensory conduction using the criteria from EFNS/PNS
Motor criteria
At least one of the following:
(a) Motor distal latency prolongation ≥50% above ULN in two nerves (excluding median neuropathy at the wrist from carpal tunnel syndrome), or
(b) Reduction of motor conduction velocity ≥30% below LLN in two nerves, or
(c) Prolongation of F-wave latency ≥20% above ULN in two nerves (≥50% if the amplitude of distal negative peak CMAP <80% of LLN), or
(d) Absence of F-waves in two nerves (if these nerves have distal negative peak CMAP amplitudes ≥20% of LLN) + ≥1 other demyelinating parameter
(e) Motor conduction block: ≥30% reduction of the proximal relative to distal negative peak CMAP amplitude, excluding the tibial nerve, and distal negative peak CMAP amplitude ≥20% of LLN in two nerves; or in one nerve + ≥ 1 other demyelinating parameter
(f) Abnormal temporal dispersion: >30% duration increase between the proximal and distal negative peak CMAP (at least 100% in the tibial nerve) in ≥2 nerves, or
(g) Distal CMAP duration (interval between onset of the first negative peak and return to baseline of the last negative peak) prolongation in ≥1 nerve in ≥1 other nerve
- (LFF 2 Hz) median > 8.4 ms, ulnar > 9.6 ms, peroneal > 8.8 ms, tibial > 9.2 ms
- (LFF 5 Hz) median > 8.0 ms, ulnar > 8.6 ms, peroneal > 8.5 ms, tibial > 8.3 ms
- (LFF 10 Hz) median > 7.8 ms, ulnar > 8.5 ms, peroneal > 8.3 ms, tibial > 8.2 ms
- (LFF 20 Hz) median > 7.4 ms, ulnar > 7.8 ms, peroneal > 8.1 ms, tibial > 8.0 ms
Sensory criteria
- Sensory conduction abnormalities are defined as if the result met any of the following:
- Prolonged distal latency
- Reduced sensory nerve action potential (SNAP)
- Slowed conduction velocity outside of normal limits
- Found in two nerves
Step 3: Differentiate between typical and atypical CIDP
Determine whether the patient has possible typical CIDP or typical CIDP
- Typical CIDP:
- Abnormal motor conduction in 2 nerves
- Abnormal sensory conduction in at least 2 nerves
- Possible CIDP: two circumstances
- Abnormal motor conduction in 1 nerve AND 02 supportive criteria (mentioned below)
- No abnormal motor conduction AND objective treatment* improvement AND 01 supportive criteria
*including IVIG, glucocorticoids, or plasma exchange
Supportive criteria
- Elevated CSF protein with leukocyte count <10/mm3
- MRI with gadolinium shows an enhancement and/or hypertrophy of the cauda equina, lumbosacral or cervical nerve roots, or the brachial or lumbosacral plexuses
- Response to standard treatment
- Nerve biopsy showing evidence of demyelination and/or remyelination by electron microscopy or teased fiber analysis
Differential diagnosis
- Typical CIDP
- AL amyloidosis, ATTRv polyneuropathy
- Chronic ataxic neuropathy ophthalmoplegia M-protein agglutination disialosyl antibodies (CANOMAD)
- Guillain-Barré syndrome
- Hepatic neuropathy
- HIV-related neuropathy
- Multiple myeloma
- Osteosclerotic myeloma
- POEMS syndrome
- Uremic neuropathy
- Vitamin B12 deficiency
- Distal CIDP
- Anti-MAG IgM neuropathy
- Diabetic neuropathy
- Hereditary neuropathies
- POEMS syndrome
- Vasculitic neuropathy
- Focal/multifocal CIDP
- Diabetic radiculopathy/plexopathy
- Entrapment neuropathies
- Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP)
- Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN)
- Neuralgic amyotrophy
- Peripheral nerve tumors
- Vasculitic neuropathy
- Motor CIDP
- Hereditary motor neuropathies
- Inflammatory myopathies
- Motor neuron disease
- Neuromuscular junction disorders syndrome)
- Sensory CIDP
- Cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy, vestibular areflexia syndrome (CANVAS)
- Chronic immune sensory polyradiculopathy (CISP)
- Dorsal column lesions
- Hereditary sensory neuropathies
- Idiopathic sensory neuropathy
- Sensory neuronopathy
- Toxic neuropathies
Management
- Early treatment is IMPORTANT to cease the immune attack against the myelin sheath of peripheral nerves, which in turn minimizes secondary axonal degeneration [25]
- Once symptoms stabilize after initial therapy → begin maintenance therapy to promote remission and prevent relapse
Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG)
- Indicated when rapid response is a priority
- Easier to administer than plasma exchange
- Dosage:
- 2 g/kg infused over 2 to 5 days (e.g., 0.5 g/kg/day for four days)
- Repeat IVIG 1 g/kg every 3 weeks for 2-3 months
- Follow-up
- If patients respond well → taper IVIG to 1 g/kg or even 0.4 g/kg per dose in 1-2 days
- Adverse effects:
- Headache
- Nausea
- Aseptic meningitis
- Acute renal failure
- Rash
Plasma exchange
- Compared to IVIG, plasma exchange shows similar effectiveness but is less convenient to administer and more expensive
- Only available at specialized centers and required venous access
- Dosage:
- 4-6 exchanges over 8-10 days then decrease to one exchange every 3-4 weeks
- Follow up:
- Reevaluate routinely, if symptoms occur between exchanges → adjust the schedule accordingly
- Adverse effects:
- Hypotension
- Sepsis
- Catheter-related complications
Glucocorticoids
- Indicated in patients with chronic CIDP due to its effectiveness at achieving long-term remission [26]
- Dosage:
The use of either oral or IV is based on patient and physician preference. Limited data show the superiority of one over the other
- Follow-up:
- Evaluate up to 8 weeks to decide whether there is a treatment response
- If symptoms stabilize → begin to taper glucocorticoids therapy
Clinical relapses are COMMON when tapering the dose [40]. If it happens, then increase at least 10 to 20 mg to the regimen
- Adverse effects:
- Cushingoid syndrome
- Aseptic necrosis of the femoral or humeral heads
- Osteoporosis
- Diabetes
- Hypertension
Immunosuppressive agents
- Indicated when glucocorticoids are contraindicated and for patients with refractory CIDP
- The non-exhaustive list of immune-modulator drugs that have been used to treat CIDP:
- Azathioprine
- Cyclophosphamide
- Cyclosporine
- Methotrexate
- Rituximab
- Tacrolimus
- Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
- Azathioprine and cyclophosphamide are the most commonly used medications on this list
- While those agents are promising, larger clinical trials are needed to further investigate their efficacy in CIDP
Responses to therapy assessment
Frequency of follow-ups
- Depends on which therapy and which stage of the disease
- Typically at least every three months since the initial dose or the last regimen adjustment, then adapt to patients’ clinical scenarios (e.g., shorten intervals for whose CIDP becomes worse, yearly clinical assessment for patients in remission)
Objective tools
- Exclusively relying on the subjective clinical assessment is associated with the prolongation of ineffective/inappropriate regimens and with the excessive treatment of CIDP [1]
Table 1: CIDP objective assessment tools
Tools | Clinically meaningful change threshold | Link to the instruction |
Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS) | >4 points on a 48-point scale | |
Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment Disability Scale ( add here missing) | >1 point | |
Grip strength | 8 kilopascals or >1.2 pounds/inch2 | |
Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score | >3 points | |
Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test | Not yet published | |
10-meter walking test | Not yet published |
It is not necessary to repeat electrodiagnostic studies in most cases
Prognosis
- ~2/3 of patients with CIDP respond to the starting dose of any single standard therapy (IVIG, glucocorticoids, and plasma exchange)
- ~10-15% of them are resistant to all of these [12]
- ~30% of patients with CIDP will achieve cure or remission
Further Reading
Bibliography
- Allen, J. A., & Lewis, R. A. (2015). CIDP diagnostic pitfalls and perception of treatment benefit. Neurology, 85(6), 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001833
- Barohn, R. J., Kissel, J. T., Warmolts, J. R., & Mendell, J. R. (1989). Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Clinical characteristics, course, and recommendations for diagnostic criteria. Archives of Neurology, 46(8), 878–884. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1989.00520440064022
- Berini, S. E., & Dyck, P. J. B. (2019). The utility of nerve biopsy in carefully selected patients in modern neuromuscular practice. Muscle & Nerve, 59(6), 635–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.26479
- Bosboom, W. M., van den Berg, L. H., Franssen, H., Giesbergen, P. C., Flach, H. Z., van Putten, A. M., Veldman, H., & Wokke, J. H. (2001). Diagnostic value of sural nerve demyelination in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 124(Pt 12), 2427–2438. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/124.12.2427
- Breiner, A., & Brannagan, T. H. (2014). Comparison of sensitivity and specificity among 15 criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Muscle & Nerve, 50(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.24088
- Broers, M. C., Bunschoten, C., Nieboer, D., Lingsma, H. F., & Jacobs, B. C. (2019). Incidence and Prevalence of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neuroepidemiology, 52(3–4), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1159/000494291
- Bunschoten, C., Jacobs, B. C., Van den Bergh, P. Y. K., Cornblath, D. R., & van Doorn, P. A. (2019). Progress in diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. The Lancet. Neurology, 18(8), 784–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30144-9
- Dalakas, M. C. & Medscape. (2011). Advances in the diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment of CIDP. Nature Reviews. Neurology, 7(9), 507–517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2011.121
- Donaghy, M., Mills, K. R., Boniface, S. J., Simmons, J., Wright, I., Gregson, N., & Jacobs, J. (1994). Pure motor demyelinating neuropathy: Deterioration after steroid treatment and improvement with intravenous immunoglobulin. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 57(7), 778–783. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.57.7.778
- Doneddu, P. E., Cocito, D., Manganelli, F., Fazio, R., Briani, C., Filosto, M., Benedetti, L., Mazzeo, A., Marfia, G. A., Cortese, A., Fierro, B., Jann, S., Beghi, E., Clerici, A. M., Carpo, M., Schenone, A., Luigetti, M., Lauria, G., Antonini, G., … Italian CIDP Database study group. (2019). Atypical CIDP: Diagnostic criteria, progression and treatment response. Data from the Italian CIDP Database. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 90(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2018-318714
- Dyck, P. J. B., & Tracy, J. A. (2018). History, Diagnosis, and Management of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 93(6), 777–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.03.026
- Eftimov, F., Vermeulen, M., van Doorn, P. A., Brusse, E., van Schaik, I. N., & PREDICT. (2012). Long-term remission of CIDP after pulsed dexamethasone or short-term prednisolone treatment. Neurology, 78(14), 1079–1084. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31824e8f84
- Fermand, J.-P., Bridoux, F., Dispenzieri, A., Jaccard, A., Kyle, R. A., Leung, N., & Merlini, G. (2018). Monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance: A novel concept with therapeutic implications. Blood, 132(14), 1478–1485. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-04-839480
- Figueroa, J. J., Dyck, P. J. B., Laughlin, R. S., Mercado, J. A., Massie, R., Sandroni, P., Dyck, P. J., & Low, P. A. (2012). Autonomic dysfunction in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Neurology, 78(10), 702–708. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182494d66
- Garces-Sanchez, M., Laughlin, R. S., Dyck, P. J., Engelstad, J. K., Norell, J. E., & Dyck, P. J. B. (2011). Painless diabetic motor neuropathy: A variant of diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus Neuropathy? Annals of Neurology, 69(6), 1043–1054. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22334
- Gorson, K. C., Allam, G., & Ropper, A. H. (1997). Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: Clinical features and response to treatment in 67 consecutive patients with and without a monoclonal gammopathy. Neurology, 48(2), 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.48.2.321
- Gorson, K. C., & Katz, J. (2013). Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Neurologic Clinics, 31(2), 511–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2013.01.006
- Hughes, R. a. C., Bouche, P., Cornblath, D. R., Evers, E., Hadden, R. D. M., Hahn, A., Illa, I., Koski, C. L., Léger, J. M., Nobile-Orazio, E., Pollard, J., Sommer, C., Van den Bergh, P., van Doorn, P. A., & van Schaik, I. N. (2006). European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society. European Journal of Neurology, 13(4), 326–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01278.x
- Katz, J. S., Saperstein, D. S., Gronseth, G., Amato, A. A., & Barohn, R. J. (2000). Distal acquired demyelinating symmetric neuropathy. Neurology, 54(3), 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.54.3.615
- Kieseier, B. C., Mathey, E. K., Sommer, C., & Hartung, H.-P. (2018). Immune-mediated neuropathies. Nature Reviews. Disease Primers, 4(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-018-0027-2
- Lewis, R. A., Sumner, A. J., Brown, M. J., & Asbury, A. K. (1982). Multifocal demyelinating neuropathy with persistent conduction block. Neurology, 32(9), 958–964. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.32.9.958
- Lopate, G., Pestronk, A., & Al-Lozi, M. (2005). Treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy with high-dose intermittent intravenous methylprednisolone. Archives of Neurology, 62(2), 249–254. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.62.2.249
- Mathis, S., Magy, L., Diallo, L., Boukhris, S., & Vallat, J.-M. (2012). Amyloid neuropathy mimicking chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Muscle & Nerve, 45(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.22229
- Muley, S. A., Kelkar, P., & Parry, G. J. (2008). Treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy with pulsed oral steroids. Archives of Neurology, 65(11), 1460–1464. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.65.11.1460
- Muley, S. A., & Parry, G. J. (2009). Inflammatory demyelinating neuropathies. Current Treatment Options in Neurology, 11(3), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-009-0026-4
- Nobile-Orazio, E., Cocito, D., Jann, S., Uncini, A., Beghi, E., Messina, P., Antonini, G., Fazio, R., Gallia, F., Schenone, A., Francia, A., Pareyson, D., Santoro, L., Tamburin, S., Macchia, R., Cavaletti, G., Giannini, F., Sabatelli, M., & IMC Trial Group. (2012). Intravenous immunoglobulin versus intravenous methylprednisolone for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: A randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. Neurology, 11(6), 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70093-5
- Peltier, A. C., & Donofrio, P. D. (2012). Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: From bench to bedside. Seminars in Neurology, 32(3), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1329194
- Rajabally, Y. A., & Chavada, G. (2009). Lewis-sumner syndrome of pure upper-limb onset: Diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic features. Muscle & Nerve, 39(2), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.21199
- Ruts, L., Drenthen, J., Jacobs, B. C., van Doorn, P. A., & Dutch GBS Study Group. (2010). Distinguishing acute-onset CIDP from fluctuating Guillain-Barre syndrome: A prospective study. Neurology, 74(21), 1680–1686. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e07d14
- Ruts, L., van Koningsveld, R., & van Doorn, P. A. (2005). Distinguishing acute-onset CIDP from Guillain-Barré syndrome with treatment related fluctuations. Neurology, 65(1), 138–140. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000167549.09664.b8
- Sabatelli, M., Madia, F., Mignogna, T., Lippi, G., Quaranta, L., & Tonali, P. (2001). Pure motor chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Journal of Neurology, 248(9), 772–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004150170093
- Schneider-Hohendorf, T., Schwab, N., Uçeyler, N., Göbel, K., Sommer, C., & Wiendl, H. (2012). CD8+ T-cell immunity in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Neurology, 78(6), 402–408. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318245d250
- Sommer, C., Koch, S., Lammens, M., Gabreels-Festen, A., Stoll, G., & Toyka, K. V. (2005). Macrophage clustering as a diagnostic marker in sural nerve biopsies of patients with CIDP. Neurology, 65(12), 1924–1929. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000188879.19900.b7
- Thomas, P. K., Claus, D., Jaspert, A., Workman, J. M., King, R. H., Larner, A. J., Anderson, M., Emerson, J. A., & Ferguson, I. T. (1996). Focal upper limb demyelinating neuropathy. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 119 ( Pt 3), 765–774. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.3.765
- Vallat, J.-M., Sommer, C., & Magy, L. (2010). Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for a treatable condition. The Lancet. Neurology, 9(4), 402–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70041-7
- Vallat, J.-M., Tabaraud, F., Magy, L., Torny, F., Bernet-Bernady, P., Macian, F., & Couratier, P. (2003). Diagnostic value of nerve biopsy for atypical chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: Evaluation of eight cases. Muscle & Nerve, 27(4), 478–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.10348
- Van den Bergh, P. Y. K., van Doorn, P. A., Hadden, R. D. M., Avau, B., Vankrunkelsven, P., Allen, J. A., Attarian, S., Blomkwist-Markens, P. H., Cornblath, D. R., Eftimov, F., Goedee, H. S., Harbo, T., Kuwabara, S., Lewis, R. A., Lunn, M. P., Nobile-Orazio, E., Querol, L., Rajabally, Y. A., Sommer, C., & Topaloglu, H. A. (2021). European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Report of a joint Task Force-Second revision. Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System: JPNS, 26(3), 242–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/jns.12455
- Van den Bergh, P. Y., Thonnard, J. L., Duprez, T., & Laterre, E. C. (2000). Chronic demyelinating hypertrophic brachial plexus neuropathy. Muscle & Nerve, 23(2), 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(200002)23:2<283::aid-mus23>3.0.co;2-q
- van Schaik, I. N., Eftimov, F., van Doorn, P. A., Brusse, E., van den Berg, L. H., van der Pol, W. L., Faber, C. G., van Oostrom, J. C. H., Vogels, O. J. M., Hadden, R. D. M., Kleine, B. U., van Norden, A. G. W., Verschuuren, J. J. G. M., Dijkgraaf, M. G. W., & Vermeulen, M. (2010). Pulsed high-dose dexamethasone versus standard prednisolone treatment for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (PREDICT study): A double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet. Neurology, 9(3), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70021-1
- Wertman, E., Argov, Z., & Abrmasky, O. (1988). Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Features and prognostic factors with corticosteroid therapy. European Neurology, 28(4), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1159/000116266
- Xu, M., Pinto, M., Sun, C., Engelstad, J. K., James Dyck, P., Dyck, P. J., & Klein, C. J. (2019). Expanded teased nerve fibre pathological conditions in disease association. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 90(2), 138–140. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2018-319077
- Yan, W. X., Taylor, J., Andrias-Kauba, S., & Pollard, J. D. (2000). Passive transfer of demyelination by serum or IgG from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy patients. Annals of Neurology, 47(6), 765–775.
AizaMD™: Revolutionizing Clinical Documentation
Discover the power of our ambient clinical documentation system, designed to transform clinical encounters into structured SOAP notes with unmatched ease. Experience exceptional value for less than $3 per day—cheaper than your daily coffee!
- Save Time: Free up over 90 minutes daily for each provider.
- Boost Revenue: Increase daily revenue by at least $1,000 per provider.
- Enhance Coding Quality: Our detailed documentation supports superior coding accuracy, ensuring optimal reimbursement.
- Maximize Engagement and Interaction: Dedicate more time to patient care and less to typing, fostering richer and more effective conversations between clinicians and patients
AizaMD™: Automated Radiology Report Generation!
Discover our breakthrough Radiology AI reporting platform built on Ambient AI. It enhances productivity and minimizes fatigue. Benefit from best-in-class accuracy with our automated radiology report generation, all at market-leading pricing.
📈 Efficiency: Cut dictation times by up to 50% (Less words, More report!
🎯 Focus: Keep your eyes on the images, not the keyboard!
💸 Revenue: Boost revenue by at least 20%
📑 Clarity: Patient summary in plain English